About this Author
Jean-Manuel Izaret, a senior partner at BCG, heads global marketing, sales, and pricing. Arnab Sinha, also a senior partner, leads pricing in consumer sectors and North America.
2023
Business & Money
Finance
14:42 Min
Conclusion
7 Key Points
Conclusion
Rethinking pricing strategies revolutionizes businesses with value-driven approaches and dynamic adaptation. Innovative models, such as payer licensing agreements, tackle societal challenges like healthcare access and promoting equitable solutions.
Abstract
In today's competitive market, pricing isn't just about making money ”creating value and teamwork between sellers and buyers. Authors Jean-Manuel Izaret and Arnab Sinha, experts at Boston Consulting Group, emphasize this shift, urging businesses to adopt innovative pricing strategies. They highlight seven distinct pricing models, showing how companies like Tesla and Amazon have reshaped industries by sharing value with customers. By adopting dynamic pricing and tailored approaches like payer licensing agreements, companies can tackle societal challenges such as access to life-saving medications while ensuring their own success and sustainability.
Key Points
Summary
Strategic pricing boosts growth and performance for businesses.
Many individuals perceive pricing as a dry, mathematical process where a company aims to extract the highest possible value from transactions. This perspective assumes that business transactions are zero-sum “ meaning one party's gain results in another's loss “ and that factors such as demand, willingness to pay, and competition remain fixed. However, this pricing perspective overlooks the dynamic nature of price inputs and the potential for sellers to collaborate with buyers, share value, and cultivate loyalty.
Sellers adopting an alternative approach to pricing can break free from zero-sum constraints and revolutionize their businesses and markets as a whole. For instance, in the early 1900s, Henry Ford revolutionized the automobile industry and dominated global production by abandoning market-driven pricing in favor of innovating methods to lower prices.
Rethink Pricing Strategies
Classic pricing methods can sometimes feel like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole for businesses. They often force decisions that don't quite fit the unique circumstances of a company. Instead of rushing into pricing based solely on costs, competition, or value, it's essential to take a step back and strategize.
Markets are always evolving, so it's crucial to keep an eye on the landscape. While it's essential to understand the game being played in your industry, remember that you don't always have to play by those rules. Many companies have reshaped their markets by changing their pricing strategies.
Services priced according to customer value in the Value Game.
Apple excels at playing and winning what's called the Value Game. In this game, a company offers a product or service that's way better than what others have, attracting a big group of customers with different needs. Apple became a top player in the market for MP3 players and smartphones by introducing products that were unmatched in terms of both what they could do and how they made people feel: the iPod in 2001 and the iPhone in 2007. Because its customer base was made up of lots of different types of people, Apple could pretty much set prices however it wanted.
When companies create products that give customers a lot of value, they can build a strong position in the market. But to stay ahead when new competitors show up, they have to keep investing in making even better stuff. By sharing value with customers, companies can keep them coming back, sell a lot, and quickly become a big deal in the market. However, some companies prefer to keep more of the value for themselves. For example, makers of luxury goods like fancy bags or watches charge high prices because they make a big profit on each item sold.
In the Uniform Game, companies fix one ideal price for all customers.
In markets where there are a ton of buyers and sellers offering similar stuff, sellers need to be smart about setting prices. They use something called elasticity, which is how much customers care about price changes. If customers are super sensitive to price changes, we say the demand is elastic. This means even a small price change can make a lot of people buy more or less of the product. In this game, called the Uniform Game, sellers want to make the most profit possible. They figure out the best price by looking at how customers react to price changes. Everyone knows what the price is, and everyone pays the same amount.
To set prices, sellers use fancy tools like the profit function. It's like a curve that shows how elastic demand is and how much it costs to make the product. Sellers pick a price that's just right among a bunch of competitive prices.
But here's the cool part: sellers can change how sensitive customers are to prices. They do this by offering deals, coupons, or other perks that make people more likely to buy. This boosts demand and helps sellers sell more stuff.
Sellers have to understand their customers. They need to know how much people care about price, what other options they have, how much money they have to spend, and what makes their product different from others.
In the Cost Game, pricing in commoditized markets is based on efficiency.
In markets where shoppers have lots of options and can haggle over prices, sellers mainly compete on how much they charge “ they're in the Cost Game. For instance, in the construction industry, companies win contracts by offering the lowest bids. These markets usually have many sellers, none of whom stand out as the clear leader, and a bunch of big buyers who all want different things. Offers in these markets often have a big part of their cost that changes depending on how much is sold.
To do well in the Cost Game, leaders have to make sure their prices match up tightly with their costs. This means being efficient, finding ways to stand out, giving customers a fair deal, and building trust. If you play the Cost Game right, you can end up spending less, grabbing a bigger share of the market, and making more profit. But to succeed, sellers have to figure out exactly what their costs are and how selling more stuff will affect how much it costs to make each thing. With this info, sellers can make the most of what they can do and pick a price that reflects what it costs them to make stuff. They can also work with buyers to make things run smoother and cut costs for everyone.
Companies engage in high-stakes negotiations, playing the Power Game.
The hard disk drive industry in the 1990s and 2000s was like a high-stakes game. Only a few companies were players, and every deal they made could make or break them. It was all about keeping the market in balance, like a delicate scale. Game theory, a tool for analyzing strategic interactions, became crucial for decision-makers in this intense market.
In such markets, products often had to meet strict technical standards, making them very similar. This meant that companies had to find other ways to stand out and protect their profits. As demand for these products skyrocketed, prices often dropped rapidly. To stay afloat, sellers needed to find ways to control their prices and margins.
One way to do this was by using the differences between companies to their advantage. This could mean having a more reliable supply chain or offering unique product features. Instead of focusing on individual deals, companies needed to set overall goals to guide their decisions. They could use tools like pricing grids to set target prices and resist pressure to lower them.
Sellers offer tailored solutions and discounts to diverse buyers in the Custom Game.
The heavy-duty commercial truck industry is like a complex game where only a few companies sell to many different types of buyers, such as individual truck owners, logistics companies, and big retailers like FedEx. This market is what we call a Custom Game. In this game, sellers offer lots of different products, and buyers purchase them in all sorts of quantities. The way people buy and sell trucks can be pretty chaotic because there are so many options and ways to do deals. It's tough for buyers to compare trucks from different sellers because there are so many choices.
To make things even more complicated, sellers often negotiate prices with buyers, and they often give discounts to make their deals look better. This can make things even messier because the price you pay for a truck might depend on how good you are at negotiating. To try and make things a bit less crazy, companies sometimes offer extra incentives to encourage people to buy from them. But this doesn't always work, and it can make the chaos even worse. Instead of just relying on discounts, companies could try other tactics, like adding extra fees or offering discounts based on what the truck is used for “ kind of like how the heavy-duty truck industry sometimes adds extra charges for things like the cost of materials.
There's a neat little tool called the natural volume slope (NVS) that can help sellers figure out how much power they have when negotiating prices. It's not just useful in the Custom Game “ it can also help in other types of games businesses play, like the Choice Game and the Power Game.
Companies in the Choice Game tailor offer to influence buyer behavior effectively.
Starbucks became a $32 billion business and the world's biggest coffee seller by mastering what we can call the "Choice Game." In this game, a small group of sellers caters to a wide range of customers with different preferences. They offer various options designed to match different customer needs. These options are crafted carefully to fit what different groups of customers perceive as valuable. The way these options are presented influences what customers choose to buy. This is particularly common in markets where products, like coffee, have low additional costs to produce.
Typically, sellers offer a range of choices, like a good, better, best lineup, or different package sizes. Sometimes, they even allow for some customization. Then, they use tricks from behavioral science to guide customers toward certain choices. These tricks include things like making a high-end option available to make a cheaper one seem more attractive, or offering a less appealing option to push customers towards a specific choice. They might also present a certain price first to set a reference point for buyers.
The Dynamic Game, sellers adapt prices instantly based on supply and demand.
In the late 1970s, airlines began using algorithms to set ticket prices based on demand and other factors. Nowadays, with the help of artificial intelligence, these algorithms have become even more powerful. They allow sellers to adjust prices on the fly, aiming to maximize volumes, revenues, profits, or a combination of these. This is what we call the Dynamic Game.
Take the example of the San Francisco Giants baseball team. In 2007, they adopted a dynamic ticketing system that adjusted seat prices according to demand. By 2010, their ticket revenue had grown by 7%, and they were consistently selling out games.
Dynamic pricing isn't just about adjusting prices in real-time. It's about transforming the market itself. This means customers will see changes in their access and options, and the market will become more efficient. To stay ahead, sellers need to constantly improve their strategies.
Other companies can also benefit from dynamic pricing, whether they're focused on cutting costs or offering customized products. But playing the Dynamic Game goes beyond just adjusting prices. It's about reshaping the market and staying ahead of the competition.
Innovative pricing can address societal issues like access to vital medications.
Drug companies face a challenge with medications for serious diseases: they need to make money in the short term while providing long-term benefits. Currently, they often charge per treatment, but a better approach might be to focus on the overall value of the treatment.
One promising model is called the payer licensing agreement (PLA). Instead of charging per treatment, this model allows healthcare systems to pay a fixed fee annually for a license to provide treatment to everyone who needs it for a certain period. This makes life-saving drugs more affordable and encourages healthcare systems to treat more people quickly.
PLAs are a win-win: they keep overall healthcare costs down while ensuring that drug companies still get the rewards they need. Similar approaches could also help address other big issues, like climate change and social justice.
Share: